🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.